Nine tools compared on what they actually require — from you, and from the people responding. Those are two different questions, and most comparisons only answer one of them.
Seven of the nine tools here need no account from anyone. StrawPoll, Polltab, Ferendum, Poll Maker, When2Meet, Rallly and VoteGenerator all let you build a poll and let people answer it without a single registration.
The distinction that catches people out is create versus vote. Almost every poll tool lets people vote without an account — Doodle, Poll Everywhere, Mentimeter and SurveyMonkey all do. Far fewer let you build the poll without registering first. When a tool advertises "no signup", check which one it means.
The narrowest gap is ranked choice without an account. The no-signup tools are mostly single-choice only. The ranked-choice tools mostly require the organiser to register, and some charge per voter.
| Tool | Account to create | Account to vote | Poll types | Free limit | Ads | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VoteGenerator | No | No | 8 incl. instant-runoff ranked choice, scheduling, RSVP | 100 responses/poll, 3 active | None | The widest range of poll types without an account |
| StrawPoll | No | No | Multiple choice and variants | No published vote cap | After ad-free quota | High-volume public polls |
| Polltab | No | No | Multiple choice, image polls | Not published | Not published | Image and picture polls |
| Ferendum | No | No | Multiple choice, date polls | Not published | Yes, on free | Quick WhatsApp and group polls |
| Poll Maker | No | No | Multiple choice | Unlimited, per their site | Not published | The simplest possible poll |
| Google Forms | Yes | No* | Forms and quizzes, no ranked choice | Unlimited responses | None | Long forms and unlimited data collection |
| When2Meet | No | No | Availability grid only | No limit | Reports vary | Finding a time when you have no candidate dates |
| Rallly | No | No | Date polls only | No published limit | None | Open-source, self-hostable scheduling |
| RankedVote | Yes | No | Ranked choice | Basic RCV free | None | Formal ranked-choice elections |
| CIVS | Yes* | Email required | Condorcet methods | Free | None | Academic and organisational elections |
* Google Forms respondents need an account only if the form is restricted to an organisation or limits one response per person. CIVS allows anyone to create a poll, but the supervisor and all voters must have email addresses, since ballots are distributed by email. Where a figure is marked "not published", the vendor does not state it clearly on their site — check before relying on it. All details from vendor documentation as of August 2026.
Requirements are only half the question. This is what you get once you're in.
| Tool | Multiple choice | Ranked choice | Rating scale | Scheduling | RSVP | Image poll | Multi-question survey | Slack app | Templates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VoteGenerator | Yes | Yes, instant-runoff | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, native app | 120+ |
| StrawPoll | Yes | Not published | Not published | Separate product | Not published | Yes | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Polltab | Yes | Not published | Not published | No | Not published | Yes | No | Not published | Not published |
| Ferendum | Yes | Not published | Not published | Date polls | Not published | Not published | No | Not published | Not published |
| Poll Maker | Yes | Not published | Not published | No | No | Not published | No | Not published | Not published |
| Google Forms | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Third-party only | Yes |
| When2Meet | No | No | No | Grid only | No | No | No | No | No |
| Rallly | No | No | No | Date polls | No | No | No | No | No |
| RankedVote | No | Yes, instant-runoff | No | No | No | No | No | Not published | Not published |
| CIVS | No | Yes, Condorcet | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Slack: VoteGenerator has a native app with slash commands, in-message voting and timezone-aware recurring polls. Google Forms has no native app, though third-party connectors exist. We found no Slack app published by the others, but have marked those "not published" rather than absent. "Not published" means the vendor does not state it clearly on their site — we have not marked it as absent, only as unverified. StrawPoll offers scheduling through a separate product, StrawPoll Meetings, rather than as a poll type. Verified against vendor documentation, August 2026.
Put the two requirements together and the field thins out sharply.
The tools that need no signup mostly do single-choice voting only. StrawPoll, Polltab, Ferendum and Poll Maker are all built around one question with one answer.
The tools that do ranked choice mostly need an account. RankedVote requires the organiser to register. CIVS requires email addresses from every voter. OpaVote charges roughly $10 per 125 voters.
Whether that gap matters depends on how often single-choice voting actually picks the wrong winner. We simulated 660,000 group votes to find out: with five options on the ballot, the plurality winner holds no outright majority 84.3% of the time. The methodology and code are published if you want to check the working.
If you want a group to rank options and you don't want anyone creating an account, the field is close to empty. VoteGenerator sits in that overlap, which is the honest reason it appears in this list — not because it beats StrawPoll on volume or When2Meet on friction, because it doesn't.
These aren't ranked best to worst. They optimise for different constraints.
Whether your respondents will see advertising. Ferendum's free tier is ad-supported and StrawPoll shows ads once the ad-free quota is used. For an internal team poll that rarely matters. For a poll going to clients, parents or customers it matters a great deal, because the advert reflects on you rather than on the tool.
What "anonymous" actually means. Most tools mean the voter's name isn't displayed. Some still record device type, approximate location and precise timestamps, which can allow responses to be re-identified by the order they arrived. If you're collecting employee or patient feedback, ask what is stored rather than what is shown.
For transparency about our own: VoteGenerator's Anonymous Mode is opt-in per poll and enforced on the server. When it's on, device, country, region and referrer are never collected at all rather than collected and hidden, and timestamps are stored as dates. We can't audit how the other tools implement it, which is precisely why it's worth asking each of them directly.
Every tool here relies on browser cookies to prevent repeat voting rather than verified identity. That's fine for a team lunch and inadequate for anything consequential.
If the vote genuinely matters — a board election, a union ballot, a shareholder resolution — you want single-use access codes or a verified voter list. CIVS handles this by emailing individual ballots. VoteGenerator's Business plan issues unique single-use access codes and can restrict embeds to approved domains. For a formal election with a registered membership, OpaVote, ElectionBuddy and Simply Voting are purpose-built for it and worth the fee.
The general point holds regardless: no-signup convenience and verified identity pull against each other, and every tool here resolves that trade-off by defaulting to convenience.