What's in this template
Seven questions separating content from delivery from pacing — because 'the course was fine' tells you nothing about which of those to change.
Why most course feedback is useless
Named feedback is polite feedback
A student who might be taught by you again will not criticise your delivery with their name on it. Anonymous is the only setting that produces usable answers.
Separate content from delivery
'Good course' could mean the material was strong or the teaching was. Asking separately is what makes the result actionable.
Pacing is the most common failure
More courses fail on pace than on content. It's also the easiest thing to fix once you know, and the thing students most rarely volunteer unprompted.
Timing beats length
Feedback collected in the final session gets a high response rate. Emailed a week later, it gets answered by the two students with strong opinions.
Run it in three steps
Adjust the questions
Keep the separation between content, delivery, and pacing. Add anything specific to your format.
Collect it in the final session
Show a QR code and give it three minutes. Response rates collapse once people leave the room.
Compare across cohorts
The same questions run each time show whether a change actually improved things.